scales.png

JUSTICE FOR THE CONVICTED

MARTELL ROGERS

the.martell.rogers@gmail.com

  • facebook
  • Home

  • Martell's Case

    • Thesis
    • Point 1: The US Constitution
    • Point 2: No Probable Cause
    • Point 3: No New or Unused Evidence
    • Point 4: Not Transactionally Related
    • Addendum: Appeal Denied
    • Timeline of Events
  • About Martell

  • Blog

  • Subscribe

  • Donate

  • Forum

  • More

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.

    Thesis Statement

    The reissued count cannot be valid because each of the following are true:

    Because of the U.S. Constitution, citizens of Wisconsin may only be bound and criminally charged for a crime if either

    1. Probable cause for the charge is found in a preliminary hearing

    2. The item is deemed "transactionally related" to another crime where probable cause exists

    No probable cause for the count was ever factually found on the record.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court decided new or unused evidence is required to reintroduce a charge (see WI statute 970.04, State v. Brown) and the State had no new or unused evidence in the trial court.

    This count is not "transactionally related" based on the 7 criteria Wisconsin uses to determine this (see State v. Richer, State v. Burke).

    Click on each statement to learn more

    Examine each point in detail

    ©2018 by J4C. Proudly created with Wix.com